Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque373 Nm275 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t154 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 355Nm262lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,885kg4,156lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 has 15 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 18 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























