Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
2.0
280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan1999-2001
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V
2.0
280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1998-1999
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 39.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0PowerTorque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsBMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsVolvoS802.8 24V T6
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsBMW7 Series (E38)740i
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8