Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsAUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan1999-2001
VS

AUDI S4 (8D/B5)

2.7 BiTurbo V6

265 hp2671 ccGasolineAWDManualTwin-turboSedan1997-2001

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    206 hp/t
    154 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
Power
280hp209kW
265hp198kW
Torque
373Nm275lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight-
2,060kg4,542lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
55.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
14.7s
Calculated
17.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
549km341mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,671cc163cu in
Length
4,350mm171in
4,483mm176in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,733mm68in
Height
1,405mm55in
1,396mm55in
Wheelbase
2,510mm99in
2,607mm103in
Front track
1,510mm59in
1,498mm59in
Rear track
1,505mm59in
1,490mm59in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
-
Trunk volume-
440L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
62L
CO2 emissions-
271g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
  • AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.06,500 rpm2,750 rpm6,750 rpm
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V65,800 rpm1,850-3,600 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.7 s
17.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
178 km/h
111 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
265 hp
198 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 has 15 hp more than AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.04.9 s
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V65.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
265 hp
198 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,483 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,396 mm
55.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,483 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,396 mm
55.0 in
Range score
-
549 km
341 mi
CO2 score
-
271 g/km
Trunk score
-
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6
Consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.82 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,966 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 150 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B8)3.0 TFSI V6
2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B8)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B9)Facelift 20193.0 TDI V6
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B9)3.0 TDI V6
2.0
540i V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 Avant (B8)3.0 TFSI V6
2.0
4.2 V8 40V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 Avant (B8)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 vs AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster