Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
2.0
280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan1999-2001
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0PowerTorque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsBMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i