Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range505 km314 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score78/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 383Nm282lb-ft | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 18.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 4,455mm175in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 18.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 280 hp 209 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 5.9 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























