Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 TvsAUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001 4.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII

2.0 T

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2001-2003
VS

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001

4.2 V8

300 hp4172 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2001-2004

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,380 kg
    3,042 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    203 hp/t
    151 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.4 L/100 km
    15.3 mpg US
    18.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
Power
280hp209kW
300hp224kW
Torque
383Nm282lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,380kg3,042lb
1,750kg3,858lb
Gross weight-
2,290kg5,049lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
57.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
71.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
18.4s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb
Calculated
171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
505km314mi
Calculated
631km392mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
4,172cc255cu in
Length
4,455mm175in
4,833mm190in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,453mm57in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,759mm109in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,578mm62in
Rear track
1,515mm60in
1,590mm63in
Max trunk volume-
434L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
82L
CO2 emissions-
312g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 TAUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T6,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V86,200 rpm3,000-4,000 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.4 s
23.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
280 hp
209 kW
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
300 hp
224 kW

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 has 20 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T and AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
1,750 kg
3,858 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T6.1 s
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V86.9 s

Although AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T and AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T and AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
505 km
314 mi
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
631 km
392 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
280 hp
209 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
300 hp
224 kW
6.9 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,455 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,453 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
6.1 s
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
Power
280 hp
209 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,455 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,453 mm
57.2 in
Range score
505 km
314 mi
631 km
392 mi
CO2 score
-
312 g/km
Trunk score
-
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 TAUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T

  • Is 370 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 4.2 V8

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Has 126 km (78 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
4.2 V8
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8vsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
2.0 T
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
4.2 V8
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V
2.0 T
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
4.2 V8
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8vsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
2.0 T
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
4.2 V8
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8vsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V
2.0 T
540i V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsBMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8
4.2 V8
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8vsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
2.0 T
430 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
4.2 V8
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)50 TDI V6
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T vs AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001 4.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster