Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsJaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
VS

Jaguar XJ (X350)

4.2 V8 32V

300 hp4196 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,320 kg
    2,910 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    212 hp/t
    158 kW/t
    4.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.4 L/100 km
    15.3 mpg US
    18.3 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V

  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    411 Nm
    303 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    780 km
    485 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Power
280hp209kW
300hp224kW
Torque
383Nm282lb-ft
411Nm303lb-ft
Curb weight
1,320kg2,910lb
1,615kg3,560lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
17.6s
Calculated
20.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb
Calculated
186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
505km314mi
Calculated
780km485mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
4,196cc256cu in
Length
4,490mm177in
5,090mm200in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,448mm57in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
3,034mm119in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,556mm61in
Rear track
1,515mm60in
1,546mm61in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
-
Trunk volume
430L
470L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
85L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V6,000 rpm4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.6 s
20.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
168 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
280 hp
209 kW
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
300 hp
224 kW

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has 20 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
411 Nm
303 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
1,615 kg
3,560 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.05.9 s
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V6.6 s

Although Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
505 km
314 mi
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
780 km
485 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
300 hp
224 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
5,090 mm
200.4 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Power
280 hp
209 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
5,090 mm
200.4 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in
Range score
505 km
314 mi
780 km
485 mi
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Is 295 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
4.2 V8 32V
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
4.2 V8 32V
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
4.2 V8 32V
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
4.2 V8 32V
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
2.0
430 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
4.2 V8 32V
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
2.0
R 2.5i 20V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
4.2 V8 32V
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 vs Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster