Car comparison

Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20VvsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60

R 2.5i 20V

300 hp2521 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2004
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    636 km
    395 mi
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60R 2.5i 20VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
300hp224kW
280hp209kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
383Nm282lb-ft
Curb weight
1,614kg3,558lb
1,320kg2,910lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
17.1s
Calculated
17.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
636km395mi
Calculated
505km314mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,521cc154cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,606mm181in
4,490mm177in
Width
1,804mm71in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,431mm56in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,715mm107in
2,625mm103in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,515mm60in
Rear track
1,542mm61in
1,515mm60in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
424L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,034L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20VMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V5,500 rpm1,950-5,250 rpm5,750 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60R 2.5i 20VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.1 s
17.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.6 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
179 km/h
111 mph
177 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
300 hp
224 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
280 hp
209 kW

Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V has 20 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
383 Nm
282 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
1,614 kg
3,558 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
1,320 kg
2,910 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V5.7 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.05.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
636 km
395 mi
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
505 km
314 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
300 hp
224 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
424 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,606 mm
181.3 in
Height
1,431 mm
56.3 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
5.7 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60R 2.5i 20VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,614 kg
3,558 lb
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
Fuel consumption
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
424 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,606 mm
181.3 in
Height
1,431 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
636 km
395 mi
505 km
314 mi
Trunk score
424 L
15.0 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 R 2.5i 20VMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Is 294 kg lighter
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R 2.5i 20V
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20VvsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
R 2.5i 20V
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20VvsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
R 2.5i 20V
2.9 T6 24V
VS
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20VvsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
R 2.5i 20V
2.8 24V T6
VS
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20VvsVolvoS802.8 24V T6
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
R 2.5i 20V
4.2 V8 32V
VS
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20VvsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
2.0
430 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
R 2.5i 20V
4.2 V8
VS
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20VvsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
R 2.5i 20V
4.2 V8 40V
VS
VolvoS60R 2.5i 20VvsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)4.2 V8 40V
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster