Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20VvsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.9 T6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,614 kg3,558 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score78/100
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,614kg3,558lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,922cc178cu in |
| Length | 4,606mm181in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,570mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | 1,126L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 272g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5,500 rpm | 1,950-5,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 5,200 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW |
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V has 28 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V and Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 636 km 395 mi |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 272 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V | Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























