Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.9 T6 24V
272 hp2922 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2003-2006
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score78/100
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 383Nm282lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,922cc178cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,570mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,548mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,126L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 272g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24VPowerTorque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 5,200 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 has 8 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 272 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 | Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 3 Nm more
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
- Has 203 km (126 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Volvo S80 2.9 T6 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24VvsVolvoS802.8 24V T6
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24VvsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24VvsVolvoS40 II2.5
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24VvsVolvoS702.3 T5
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24VvsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24VvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6