Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsAUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan1999-2001
VS

AUDI A6 (4B/C5)

4.2 V8 40V

300 hp4172 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan1999-2001

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    206 hp/t
    154 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V

  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best economy score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
Power
280hp209kW
300hp224kW
Torque
373Nm275lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,730kg3,814lb
Gross weight-
2,310kg5,093lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
14.7s
Calculated
22.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
631km392mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
4,172cc255cu in
Length
4,350mm171in
4,833mm190in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,405mm55in
1,453mm57in
Wheelbase
2,510mm99in
2,759mm109in
Front track
1,510mm59in
1,578mm62in
Rear track
1,505mm59in
1,590mm63in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
-
Max trunk volume-
434L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
82L
CO2 emissions-
312g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40VPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.06,500 rpm2,750 rpm6,750 rpm
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V6,200 rpm3,000-4,000 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.7 s
22.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
165 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
300 hp
224 kW

AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V has 20 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
1,730 kg
3,814 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.04.9 s
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V6.9 s

Although AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V: 2.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
300 hp
224 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,453 mm
57.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
Power
280 hp
209 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,730 kg
3,814 lb
Fuel consumption
-
13.0 L/100 km
18.1 mpg US
21.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,453 mm
57.2 in
Range score
-
631 km
392 mi
CO2 score
-
312 g/km
Trunk score
-
434 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V
Consumption13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.61 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,413 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Is 370 kg lighter
  • Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
4.2 V8 40V
4.2 V8
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40VvsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
4.2 V8 40V
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40VvsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
4.2 V8 40V
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40VvsAUDIA6 (4F/C6)Facelift 20083.0 TFSI V6
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
4.2 V8 40V
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40VvsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
2.0
540i V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
4.2 V8 40V
4.2 V8 40V
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40VvsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8 40V
2.0
2.7 BiTurbo V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0vsAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
4.2 V8 40V
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40VvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)50 TDI V6
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 vs AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 4.2 V8 40V - car comparison - FastVsFaster