Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful359 hp268 kW
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Highest torque373 Nm275 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 359hp268kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.0s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 387km241mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,505mm177in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 328g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.0 s | 14.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 359 hp 268 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 has 79 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 79 hp (59 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 4.1 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 359 hp 268 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 359 hp 268 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 387 km 241 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 328 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,728 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
- Has 79 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























