Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsAUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X

2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

359 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014
VS

AUDI A8L (D4/4H)

4.2 FSI V8

372 hp4163 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8

  • Most powerful
    372 hp
    277 kW
  • Highest torque
    445 Nm
    328 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.6 L/100 km
    17.3 mpg US
    20.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    224 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    928 km
    577 mi
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    172 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
Power
359hp268kW
372hp277kW
Torque
363Nm268lb-ft
445Nm328lb-ft
Curb weight
1,560kg3,439lb
1,885kg4,156lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,535kg5,589lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
58.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
12.0s
Calculated
17.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
197hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
387km241mi
Calculated
928km577mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
4,163cc254cu in
Length
4,505mm177in
5,267mm207in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,949mm77in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,471mm58in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
3,122mm123in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,545mm61in
1,635mm64in
Ground clearance
135mm5in
-
Trunk volume-
510L
Max trunk volume-
906L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
90L
CO2 emissions
328g/km
224g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-3606,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V86,800 rpm3,500 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.0 s
17.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
200 km/h
124 mph
178 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
372 hp
277 kW

AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8 has 13 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
445 Nm
328 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
1,885 kg
4,156 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-3604.1 s
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V85.8 s

Although AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8: 1.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 4.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
387 km
241 mi
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
928 km
577 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
372 hp
277 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
Power
372 hp
277 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
5,267 mm
207.4 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
Power
372 hp
277 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
4.1 s
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
Power
359 hp
268 kW
372 hp
277 kW
Torque
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
445 Nm
328 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
1,885 kg
4,156 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
5,267 mm
207.4 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
Range score
387 km
241 mi
928 km
577 mi
CO2 score
328 g/km
224 g/km
Trunk score
-
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km16.97 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi27.32 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year2,546 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

  • Is 325 kg lighter
  • Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 82 Nm more
  • Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 541 km (336 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 104 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
4.2 FSI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
4.2 FSI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8vsAUDIA8 (D3/4E)Facelift 20074.2 FSI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
4.2 FSI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8vsAUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20074.2 FSI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
4.2 FSI V8
4.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
VS
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20134.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
4.2 FSI V8
4.2 TDI V8 clean diesel
VS
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)Facelift 20134.2 TDI V8 clean diesel
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
5.0 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
4.2 FSI V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8vsAUDIA8L (D3/4E)Facelift 20054.2 FSI V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
E 500 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)E 500 V8
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 vs AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 4.2 FSI V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster