Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsBMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998 740i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998
740i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t154 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score77/100
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best economy score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,385kg5,258lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 680km423mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,984mm196in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,862mm73in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 5,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i has 6 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 7.0 s |
Although BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i: 2.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 680 km 423 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 67 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























