Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsVolvo S80 2.8 24V T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80
2.8 24V T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t154 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 645km401mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,783cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,510mm99in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,510mm59in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 5,400 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 has 8 hp more than Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: 2.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 645 km 401 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
- Has 7 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























