Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0vsVolvo S80 2.8 24V T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan1999-2001
VS

Volvo S80

2.8 24V T6

272 hp2783 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan1998-2001

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    206 hp/t
    154 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Power
280hp209kW
272hp203kW
Torque
373Nm275lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,630kg3,594lb
Gross weight-
2,210kg4,872lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
14.7s
Calculated
22.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
645km401mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,783cc170cu in
Length
4,350mm171in
4,822mm190in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,832mm72in
Height
1,405mm55in
1,434mm56in
Wheelbase
2,510mm99in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,510mm59in
1,562mm61in
Rear track
1,505mm59in
1,560mm61in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
-
Trunk volume-
440L
Max trunk volume-
1,106L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.06,500 rpm2,750 rpm6,750 rpm
VolvoS802.8 24V T65,400 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.7 s
22.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
272 hp
203 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 has 8 hp more than Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
1,630 kg
3,594 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.04.9 s
VolvoS802.8 24V T67.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: 2.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
272 hp
203 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
Fuel consumption
-
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in
Range score
-
645 km
401 mi
Trunk score
-
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
206 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S80 2.8 24V T6
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 270 kg lighter
  • Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 vs Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster