BMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
BMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998 740ivsVolvo S80 2.8 24V T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80
2.8 24V T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best estimated range680 km423 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km423mi Calculated | 645km401mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 2,783cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,984mm196in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,862mm73in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,435mm56in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,930mm115in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 5,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 5,400 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 286 hp 213 kW |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i has 14 hp more than Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 and BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 7.0 s |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i and Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 680 km 423 mi |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 645 km 401 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 423 mi | 645 km 401 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i | Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 740i
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























