Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t154 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Best economy score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.4L/100 km12.1mpg US14.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 657km408mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,966cc303cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,038mm198in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,444mm57in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,965mm117in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 320g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.8 s | 14.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8 has 26 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | 6.5 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 4.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 657 km 408 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 320 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) S 500 V8
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 87 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0
- Is 420 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























