Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful359 hp268 kW
- Highest torque363 Nm268 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best estimated range505 km314 mi
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 359hp268kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 355Nm262lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,885kg4,156lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.0s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 387km241mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,505mm177in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 328g/km | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.0 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 359 hp 268 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 has 94 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 94 hp (70 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 4.1 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 2.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 387 km 241 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 359 hp 268 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 359 hp 268 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 387 km 241 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 328 g/km | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.85 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,728 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
- Has 94 hp more
- Has 8 Nm more
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 70 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























