Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII

2.0

265 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1998-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    383 Nm
    282 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,260 kg
    2,778 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    222 hp/t
    166 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
265hp198kW
280hp209kW
Torque
355Nm262lb-ft
383Nm282lb-ft
Curb weight
1,445kg3,186lb
1,260kg2,778lb
Gross weight
1,885kg4,156lb
-
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
39.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
20.0s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
505km314mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,490mm177in
4,350mm171in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,510mm99in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,510mm59in
Rear track
1,515mm60in
1,505mm59in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
-
Trunk volume
430L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
50L
CO2 emissions
258g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.0 s
16.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
280 hp
209 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 has 15 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
355 Nm
262 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
383 Nm
282 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
1,260 kg
2,778 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
245 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06.1 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.04.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 1.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
222 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
245 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
355 Nm
262 lb-ft
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
4.9 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
1,260 kg
2,778 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
505 km
314 mi
-
CO2 score
258 g/km
-
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
222 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Is 185 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
2.0
3.2 i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
2.0
Ralliart 2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
2.0
540i V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
2.0
430 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
2.0
2.7 BiTurbo V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
2.0
2.9 T6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
2.0
AMG C 43 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8
2.0
C 350 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster