Car comparison

AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI S4 (8D/B5)

2.7 BiTurbo V6

265 hp2671 ccGasolineAWDManualTwin-turboSedan1997-2001
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1998-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Lightest
    1,260 kg
    2,778 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    222 hp/t
    166 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
265hp198kW
280hp209kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
383Nm282lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,260kg2,778lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
39.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
17.2s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
549km341mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,671cc163cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,483mm176in
4,350mm171in
Width
1,733mm68in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,396mm55in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,607mm103in
2,510mm99in
Front track
1,498mm59in
1,510mm59in
Rear track
1,490mm59in
1,505mm59in
Trunk volume
440L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
50L
CO2 emissions
271g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0PowerTorque
  • AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V65,800 rpm1,850-3,600 rpm6,050 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.2 s
16.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
178 km/h
111 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
265 hp
198 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
280 hp
209 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 has 15 hp more than AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
383 Nm
282 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
1,260 kg
2,778 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V65.6 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.04.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 and AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
222 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
265 hp
198 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,483 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,396 mm
55.0 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,260 kg
2,778 lb
Fuel consumption
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,483 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,396 mm
55.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
549 km
341 mi
-
CO2 score
271 g/km
-
Trunk score
440 L
15.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
222 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6
Consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.82 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,966 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6

  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 250 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B8)3.0 TFSI V6
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B8)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B9)Facelift 20193.0 TDI V6
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 (B9)3.0 TDI V6
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 Avant (B8)3.0 TFSI V6
2.0
540i V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)540i V8
2.7 BiTurbo V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIS4 (8D/B5)2.7 BiTurbo V6vsAUDIS4 Avant (B8)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
2.0
AMG C 43 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8
AUDI S4 (8D/B5) 2.7 BiTurbo V6 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster