Car comparison

Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004

430 V8

282 hp4293 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2003-2005
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII

2.0

265 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Lightest
    1,445 kg
    3,186 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    183 hp/t
    137 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.4 L/100 km
    15.3 mpg US
    18.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    258 g/km
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    282 hp
    210 kW
  • Highest torque
    417 Nm
    308 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    737 km
    458 mi
  • Largest trunk
    570 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
282hp210kW
265hp198kW
Torque
417Nm308lb-ft
355Nm262lb-ft
Curb weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,445kg3,186lb
Gross weight
2,340kg5,159lb
1,885kg4,156lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
65.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
19.2s
Calculated
20.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
737km458mi
Calculated
505km314mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,293cc262cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,025mm198in
4,490mm177in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,470mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,925mm115in
2,625mm103in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,515mm60in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,515mm60in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
570L
430L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
84L
55L
CO2 emissions
270g/km
258g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0PowerTorque
  • Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V85,600 rpm3,500 rpm5,850 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.2 s
20.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
172 km/h
107 mph
171 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
282 hp
210 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW

Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 has 17 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
417 Nm
308 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
355 Nm
262 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
1,445 kg
3,186 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V86.3 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06.1 s

Although Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
737 km
458 mi
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
505 km
314 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
282 hp
210 kW
6.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
Power
282 hp
210 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
5,025 mm
197.8 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
Power
282 hp
210 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
6.3 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
282 hp
210 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
417 Nm
308 lb-ft
355 Nm
262 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
Fuel consumption
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
5,025 mm
197.8 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
737 km
458 mi
505 km
314 mi
CO2 score
270 g/km
258 g/km
Trunk score
570 L
20.1 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.95 LC100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.11 LC100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,993 LC/year2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Has 62 Nm more
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 232 km (144 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 140 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Is 390 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lexus LS III 430 V8
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

430 V8
460 V8
VS
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusLS IV460 V8
2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
430 V8
460 V8
VS
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
430 V8
460 V8
VS
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
430 V8
350
VS
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusES V (XV40)350
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
430 V8
2.0
VS
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
2.0
3.2 i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
430 V8
2.9 T6 24V
VS
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
2.0
Ralliart 2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster