Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 B4

197 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    212 km/h
    132 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,905 kg
    4,200 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    105 hp/t
    78 kW/t
    9.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Best estimated range
    1,203 km
    748 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
200hp149kW
197hp147kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,905kg4,200lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
44.1s
Calculated
66.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,184km736mi
Calculated
1,203km748mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
477L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
71L
CO2 emissions-
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B44,000 rpm1,740-2,760 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.1 s
66.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
197 hp
147 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B48.3 s

Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
1,203 km
748 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
197 hp
147 kW
8.3 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
200 hp
149 kW
197 hp
147 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,184 km
736 mi
1,203 km
748 mi
CO2 score
-
155 g/km
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 28 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 B4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 B4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 B4
2.5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 B4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
40 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
2.0 B4
330TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 B4
2.2 JTDM
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster