Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    212 km/h
    132 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,184 km
    736 mi
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
200hp149kW
186hp139kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,905kg4,200lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
73.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
44.1s
Calculated
61.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,184km736mi
Calculated
895km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
477L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.1 s
61.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 14 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.3 s

Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
895 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.3 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
200 hp
149 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,184 km
736 mi
895 km
556 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 210 Nm more
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 289 km (180 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 47 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Is 440 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.5 e-Skyactiv
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
40 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
1.5T
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster