Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    212 km/h
    132 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,184 km
    736 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Lightest
    1,877 kg
    4,138 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    109 hp/t
    81 kW/t
    9.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    601 L
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,905kg4,200lb
1,877kg4,138lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
211 km/h
131 mph
To 99% top speed
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
91.6s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
44.1s
Calculated
53.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,184km736mi
Calculated
929km577mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,648mm65in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,624mm64in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
212mm8in
Trunk volume
477L
601L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,386L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d3,750 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.1 s
53.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
211 km/h
131 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
1,877 kg
4,138 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
211 km/h
131 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d8.4 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
929 km
577 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
8.4 s
211 km/h
131 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
211 km/h
131 mph
Lightness
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
1,877 kg
4,138 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Range score
1,184 km
736 mi
929 km
577 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 255 km (159 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 28 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 124 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster