Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDIvsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020

40 TDI

204 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Lightest
    1,805 kg
    3,979 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    113 hp/t
    84 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,204 km
    748 mi
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,805kg3,979lb
1,905kg4,200lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
37.4s
Calculated
44.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,204km748mi
Calculated
1,184km736mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,682mm184in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
520L
477L
Max trunk volume
1,520L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.4 s
44.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
204 hp
152 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
222 km/h
138 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI7.6 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
1,204 km
748 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
204 hp
152 kW
7.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.6 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Lightness
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
1,204 km
748 mi
1,184 km
736 mi
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 43 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
40 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
40 TDI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDI vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster