Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015
2.2d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted212 km/h132 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,184 km736 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk503 L
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 175hp130kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Calculated | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.1s Calculated | 61.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,184km736mi Calculated | 1,115km693mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 2,191cc134cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 503L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 1,620L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 4,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.1 s | 61.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Limited | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 25 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 207 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,184 km 736 mi |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,115 km 693 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW | 8.8 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 175 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,184 km 736 mi | 1,115 km 693 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Is 425 kg lighter
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























