Car comparison

AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSIvsMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014

2.0 TFSI

180 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    136 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,115 km
    693 mi
  • Largest trunk
    503 L
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
180hp134kW
175hp130kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight
2,140kg4,718lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
78.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
39.6s
Calculated
61.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
1,115km693mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,191cc134cu in
Length
4,388mm173in
4,555mm179in
Width
1,831mm72in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,608mm63in
1,710mm67in
Wheelbase
2,603mm102in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,571mm62in
-
Rear track
1,575mm62in
-
Ground clearance-
210mm8in
Trunk volume
460L
503L
Max trunk volume
1,365L
1,620L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
58L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
136g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSIMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI4,000-6,200 rpm1,400-3,900 rpm6,450 rpm
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.6 s
61.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
180 hp
134 kW
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW

AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI has 5 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
217 km/h
135 mph
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI7.6 s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
914 km
568 mi
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,388 mm
172.8 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
175 hp
130 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,388 mm
172.8 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
1,115 km
693 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
136 g/km
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSIMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 201 km (125 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 43 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 I (8U) 2.0 TFSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI
2.2d
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.2d
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.0 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI
2.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TFSI vs Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d - car comparison - FastVsFaster