Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220dvsMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015
2.2d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,120 km696 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk503 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 175hp130kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 61.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,120km696mi Calculated | 1,115km693mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,191cc134cu in |
| Length | 4,417mm174in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 503L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,620L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 3,600-3,800 rpm | 1,400-3,000 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 4,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 61.5 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d has 2 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 207 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 7.7 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 1,120 km 696 mi |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,115 km 693 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.7 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW | 8.8 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 175 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,120 km 696 mi | 1,115 km 693 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d | Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 82 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























