Jaguar F-Pace
2.0d
180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSUV2015-2017
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0dvsMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015
2.2d
175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Fastest top speed209 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 175hp130kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.4s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 61.6s Calculated | 61.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,224km761mi Calculated | 1,115km693mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,191cc134cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 503L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,620L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0dMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dPowerTorque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 4,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 61.6 s | 61.5 s |
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 85 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has 5 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 207 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.9 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 8.8 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has more power, Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,224 km 761 mi |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,115 km 693 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW | 8.8 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 175 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 209 km/h 130 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,224 km 761 mi | 1,115 km 693 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d | Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
- Has 147 L more trunk volume
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI