Car comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2dvsMazda CX-3 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
VS

Mazda CX-3

2.0i

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Fastest top speed
    207 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    175 hp
    130 kW
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    136 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,115 km
    693 mi
  • Largest trunk
    503 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,235 kg
    2,723 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-32.0i
Power
175hp130kW
150hp112kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
204Nm150lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,235kg2,723lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
61.5s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,115km693mi
Calculated
688km427mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,191cc134cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,570mm101in
Front track-
1,523mm60in
Rear track-
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance
210mm8in
155mm6in
Trunk volume
503L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,620L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
44L
CO2 emissions
136g/km
150g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dMazda CX-3 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm
MazdaCX-32.0i6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-32.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
61.5 s
-
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d has 25 hp more than Mazda CX-3 2.0i.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-3 2.0i and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
MazdaCX-32.0i
204 Nm
150 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
MazdaCX-32.0i
1,235 kg
2,723 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-32.0i
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s
MazdaCX-32.0i8.7 s

Although Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d has more power, Mazda CX-3 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-3 2.0i and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mazda CX-3 2.0i: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi
MazdaCX-32.0i
688 km
427 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-32.0i
Power
175 hp
130 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
204 Nm
150 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.7 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,235 kg
2,723 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
1,115 km
693 mi
688 km
427 mi
CO2 score
136 g/km
150 g/km
Trunk score
503 L
17.8 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dMazda CX-3 2.0i
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 216 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 428 km (266 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 153 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Is 245 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Mazda CX-3 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0i
1.4 TFSI COD
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsAUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.0i
1.4 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
2.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
2.0i
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.2d
20i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
2.0i
1.5 TSI EVO
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsSeatArona1.5 TSI EVO
2.2d
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d vs Mazda CX-3 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster