Seat Arona
Car comparison
Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVOvsMazda CX-3 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-3
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVO
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,149 kg2,533 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions115 g/km
- Best estimated range784 km487 mi
- Largest trunk400 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | MazdaCX-32.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 204Nm150lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,149kg2,533lb | 1,235kg2,723lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 55.3s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 784km487mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,138mm163in | 4,275mm168in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,552mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,503mm59in | 1,523mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,486mm59in | 1,521mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 190mm7in | 155mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,280L | 1,260L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 115g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVO: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-3 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | MazdaCX-32.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 55.3 s | - |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 150 hp 112 kW |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 204 Nm 150 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 1,149 kg 2,533 lb |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 8.0 s |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVO and Mazda CX-3 2.0i: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVO and Mazda CX-3 2.0i: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 784 km 487 mi |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-32.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-32.0i |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVO is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-32.0i | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatArona1.5 TSI EVO | MazdaCX-32.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 204 Nm 150 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,149 kg 2,533 lb | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 784 km 487 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 115 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVO | Mazda CX-3 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Arona 1.5 TSI EVO
- Has 46 Nm more
- Is 86 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 35 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mazda CX-3 2.0i
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























