Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015
2.2d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,115 km693 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 175hp130kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,787kg3,940lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.3s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.3s Calculated | 61.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 811km504mi Calculated | 1,115km693mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,191cc134cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,710mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 503L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,620L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 3,940-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,940 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 4,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.3 s | 61.5 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 207 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 811 km 504 mi |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,115 km 693 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW | 8.8 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 175 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 811 km 504 mi | 1,115 km 693 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 112 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 307 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 305 km (189 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























