Car comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2dvsMazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
VS

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    207 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    175 hp
    130 kW
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    136 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,115 km
    693 mi
  • Largest trunk
    503 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
175hp130kW
150hp112kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
207Nm153lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
1,773kg3,909lb
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
61.5s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,115km693mi
Calculated
629km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,191cc134cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,570mm101in
Front track-
1,523mm60in
Rear track-
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance
210mm8in
155mm6in
Trunk volume
503L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,620L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
44L
CO2 emissions
136g/km
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
61.5 s
-
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d has 25 hp more than Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G8.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
175 hp
130 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
1,115 km
693 mi
629 km
391 mi
CO2 score
136 g/km
160 g/km
Trunk score
503 L
17.8 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 213 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 487 km (302 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 153 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 24 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2d
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.2d
2.0 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLA 200
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
2.2d
20i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420i
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
280TSI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d vs Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G - car comparison - FastVsFaster