Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagen Tacqua 280TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tacqua
280TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tacqua 280TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range702 km436 mi
- Largest trunk367 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score91/100
Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
- Fastest top speed200 km/h124 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t85 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | VolkswagenTacqua280TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 207Nm153lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,310kg2,888lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 1,773kg3,909lb | - |
| Top speed | 200 km/h 124 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | 702km436mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,275mm168in | 4,194mm165in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,535mm60in | 1,601mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,651mm104in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | - |
| Ground clearance | 155mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 367L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,260L | 1,192L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tacqua 280TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | VolkswagenTacqua280TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.3 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h 124 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 207 Nm 153 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 195 km/h 121 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tacqua 280TSI and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tacqua 280TSI and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 629 km 391 mi |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 702 km 436 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tacqua 280TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G | VolkswagenTacqua280TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 207 Nm 153 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 200 km/h 124 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | 702 km 436 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 367 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G | Volkswagen Tacqua 280TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tacqua 280TSI
- Has 43 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























