Car comparison

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Highest torque
    213 Nm
    157 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    200 km/h
    124 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    40/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
207Nm153lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,310kg2,888lb
1,407kg3,102lb
Gross weight
1,773kg3,909lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
To 99% top speed
76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
77.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
629km391mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,275mm168in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,765mm69in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,535mm60in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,570mm101in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,523mm60in
-
Rear track
1,521mm60in
-
Ground clearance
155mm6in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
350L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,260L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
44L
51L
CO2 emissions
160g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,407 kg
3,102 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
198 km/h
123 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G8.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
198 km/h
123 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Lightness
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
629 km
391 mi
981 km
609 mi
CO2 score
160 g/km
-
Trunk score
350 L
12.4 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Is 97 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Has 6 Nm more
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 352 km (219 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLA 200
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
1.5 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
280TSI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster