Car comparison

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q2L

35 TFSI

150 hp1395 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    200 km/h
    124 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,405 kg
    3,097 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    107 hp/t
    80 kW/t
    9.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    41/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ2L35 TFSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,405kg3,097lb
1,407kg3,102lb
Gross weight-
1,927kg4,248lb
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
To 99% top speed
77.4s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
77.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.8s
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km509mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,395cc85cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,236mm167in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,785mm70in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,548mm61in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,628mm103in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,543mm61in
-
Rear track
1,546mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
347L
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ2L35 TFSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,407 kg
3,102 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
198 km/h
123 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI8.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
820 km
509 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
198 km/h
123 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,548 mm
60.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ2L35 TFSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Lightness
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,548 mm
60.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
820 km
509 mi
981 km
609 mi
Trunk score
347 L
12.3 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q2L 35 TFSIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI

  • Has 37 Nm more
  • Is 2 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 83 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ235 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
35 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
35 TFSI
1.4 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
35 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
35 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster