Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TDI SCR

150 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,378 kg
    3,038 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    109 hp/t
    81 kW/t
    9.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,064 km
    661 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,378kg3,038lb
1,407kg3,102lb
Gross weight
1,960kg4,321lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
To 99% top speed
79.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
77.1s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
62.2s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,064km661mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,541mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
445L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,290L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR3,500 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm3,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
62.2 s
-
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,378 kg
3,038 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,407 kg
3,102 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
198 km/h
123 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G8.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,064 km
661 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
198 km/h
123 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Lightness
1,378 kg
3,038 lb
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,064 km
661 mi
981 km
609 mi
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Has 127 Nm more
  • Is 29 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 TDI SCR
280TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster