Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRvsMazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TDI SCR

150 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    123 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,064 km
    661 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
207Nm153lb-ft
Curb weight
1,415kg3,120lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
1,920kg4,233lb
1,773kg3,909lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
80.0s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
77.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
62.6s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,064km661mi
Calculated
629km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,546mm61in
1,523mm60in
Rear track
1,541mm61in
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance
161mm6in
155mm6in
Trunk volume
445L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,290L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
44L
CO2 emissions
123g/km
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR-1,750-3,000 rpm3,250 rpm
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
62.6 s
-
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR8.8 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G8.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,064 km
661 mi
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
1,064 km
661 mi
629 km
391 mi
CO2 score
123 g/km
160 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Has 133 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 435 km (270 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 95 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 37 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Is 105 kg lighter
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 TDI SCR
280TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 TDI SCR
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR vs Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G - car comparison - FastVsFaster