Car comparison

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018

2.0 SKYACTIV-G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2018-present
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Highest torque
    213 Nm
    157 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    889 km
    552 mi
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    200 km/h
    124 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    52/100
  • Best performance score
    40/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
207Nm153lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,310kg2,888lb
1,477kg3,256lb
Gross weight
1,773kg3,909lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
To 99% top speed
76.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
78.6s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
9.1s
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
629km391mi
Calculated
889km552mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,275mm168in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,765mm69in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,535mm60in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,570mm101in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,523mm60in
-
Rear track
1,521mm60in
-
Ground clearance
155mm6in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
350L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,260L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
44L
48L
CO2 emissions
160g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
9.1 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
87 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,477 kg
3,256 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
195 km/h
121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G9.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
629 km
391 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
889 km
552 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
9.1 s
195 km/h
121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
9.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
207 Nm
153 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
9.1 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Lightness
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
1,477 kg
3,256 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
629 km
391 mi
889 km
552 mi
CO2 score
160 g/km
-
Trunk score
350 L
12.4 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-GMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-3 Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G

  • Is 167 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Has 6 Nm more
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 260 km (162 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-3 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
18d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsBMWX2 (F39)18d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLA 200
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
280TSI
VS
MazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-GvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
Mazda CX-3 · Facelift 2018 2.0 SKYACTIV-G vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster