Car comparison

AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020 35 TDIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020

35 TDI

150 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-present
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,146 km
    712 mi
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Lightest
    1,477 kg
    3,256 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    102 hp/t
    76 kW/t
    9.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,477kg3,256lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
To 99% top speed
80.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
78.6s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
9.1s
0-200 km/h
49.5s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
100hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,146km712mi
Calculated
889km552mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,208mm166in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,794mm71in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,508mm59in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,601mm102in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,542mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
355L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,000L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
48L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI3,000-4,200 rpm1,600-2,750 rpm4,450 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
9.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
49.5 s
-
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,477 kg
3,256 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
210 km/h
130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
195 km/h
121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI8.2 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G9.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
1,146 km
712 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
889 km
552 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
150 hp
112 kW
8.2 s
210 km/h
130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
9.1 s
195 km/h
121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,208 mm
165.7 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.2 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
9.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
9.1 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
1,477 kg
3,256 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
4,208 mm
165.7 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,146 km
712 mi
889 km
552 mi
Trunk score
355 L
12.5 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
100 hp/t
75 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI

  • Has 147 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 257 km (160 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Is 18 kg lighter
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q2 35 TDI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

35 TDI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ235 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
35 TDI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
35 TDI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
35 TDI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
35 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
35 TDI
1.4 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
18d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsBMWX2 (F39)18d
35 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
AUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020 35 TDI vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster