Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2dvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed207 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful175 hp130 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,115 km693 mi
- Largest trunk503 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Lightest1,477 kg3,256 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 175hp130kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 213Nm157lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,477kg3,256lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 78.6s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 61.5s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,115km693mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,191cc134cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,555mm179in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,710mm67in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,655mm105in |
| Ground clearance | 210mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 503L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,620L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 4,500 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 61.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d has 25 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 1,477 kg 3,256 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 195 km/h 121 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 8.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 1,115 km 693 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 175 hp 130 kW | 8.8 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 175 hp 130 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 207 km/h 129 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,477 kg 3,256 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,115 km 693 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 207 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 226 km (141 mi) more estimated range
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Is 3 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























