Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TDI SCR

150 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    200 km/h
    124 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,457 kg
    3,212 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    103 hp/t
    77 kW/t
    9.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,078 km
    670 mi
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,457kg3,212lb
1,477kg3,256lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
To 99% top speed
74.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
78.8s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
9.1s
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,078km670mi
Calculated
889km552mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,234mm167in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,593mm102in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,546mm61in
-
Rear track
1,547mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
392L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,237L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
48L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR3,500 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm3,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
9.1 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,457 kg
3,212 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,477 kg
3,256 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
195 km/h
121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR8.5 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G9.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
1,078 km
670 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
889 km
552 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
150 hp
112 kW
8.5 s
200 km/h
124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
9.1 s
195 km/h
121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.5 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
9.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
9.1 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Lightness
1,457 kg
3,212 lb
1,477 kg
3,256 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,078 km
670 mi
889 km
552 mi
Trunk score
392 L
13.8 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR

  • Has 127 Nm more
  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Has 38 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 TDI SCR
280TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0 TDI SCR
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCRvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
18d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsBMWX2 (F39)18d
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster