Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted212 km/h132 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,184 km736 mi
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Lightest1,477 kg3,256 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 213Nm157lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,477kg3,256lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Calculated | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.6s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,184km736mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 48L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.1 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Limited | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 50 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 1,477 kg 3,256 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 195 km/h 121 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,184 km 736 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 213 Nm 157 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb | 1,477 kg 3,256 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,184 km 736 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 237 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 295 km (183 mi) more estimated range
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
- Is 428 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























