Volkswagen T-Cross · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Cross · Facelift 2023 1.5 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI SCR
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Cross Facelift 2023 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,326 kg2,923 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,326kg2,923lb | 1,457kg3,212lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.3s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,127mm162in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,551mm100in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,516mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,281L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Cross Facelift 2023 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.3 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 1,326 kg 2,923 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,457 kg 3,212 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross Facelift 2023 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Volkswagen T-Cross Facelift 2023 1.5 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 667 km 414 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,326 kg 2,923 lb | 1,457 kg 3,212 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Cross Facelift 2023 1.5 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Cross Facelift 2023 1.5 TSI
- Is 131 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 63 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 412 km (256 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























