AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDIvsAUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020 35 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q2 · Facelift 2020
35 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,354 km841 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight100 hp/t75 kW/t10.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score45/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.8s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 80.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 52.9s Calculated | 49.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,354km841mi Calculated | 1,146km712mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,208mm166in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,637mm64in | 1,508mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,611mm63in | 1,542mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 1,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 52.9 s | 49.5 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI has 13 hp more than AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 9.0 s |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 8.2 s |
Although AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI has more power, AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,354 km 841 mi |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,146 km 712 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.0 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | AUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,354 km 841 mi | 1,146 km 712 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI | AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 208 km (129 mi) more estimated range
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
AUDI Q2 Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























