AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
35 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,354 km841 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 96.0s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 52.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 890km553mi Calculated | 1,354km841mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,682mm184in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,637mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,611mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 1,520L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 52.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 41 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 890 km 553 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 1,354 km 841 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 163 hp 122 kW | 9.0 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 890 km 553 mi | 1,354 km 841 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 41 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 464 km (288 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























