AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,563 km971 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 95.3s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 55.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 890km553mi Calculated | 1,563km971mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,629mm182in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,898mm75in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 1,560L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 55.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 890 km 553 mi |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 1,563 km 971 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 890 km 553 mi | 1,563 km 971 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 672 km (418 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























