Car comparison

Mazda CX-3 2.0ivsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-3

2.0i

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2018
VS

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TDI

150 hp1968 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    131 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,100 km
    684 mi
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    200 km/h
    124 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Lightest
    1,235 kg
    2,723 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-32.0iVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
204Nm150lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,235kg2,723lb
1,505kg3,318lb
Gross weight
1,860kg4,101lb
2,020kg4,453lb
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
77.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.7s
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
688km427mi
Calculated
1,100km684mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,275mm168in
4,234mm167in
Width
1,765mm69in
1,819mm72in
Height
1,535mm60in
1,573mm62in
Wheelbase
2,570mm101in
2,593mm102in
Front track
1,523mm60in
1,546mm61in
Rear track
1,521mm60in
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance
155mm6in
-
Trunk volume
350L
-
Max trunk volume
1,260L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
44L
55L
CO2 emissions
150g/km
131g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-3 2.0iVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-3 2.0i: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-32.0i6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-32.0iVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i
204 Nm
150 lb-ft
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i
1,235 kg
2,723 lb
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i
200 km/h
124 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i8.7 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI8.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-3 2.0i: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
100 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-32.0i
688 km
427 mi
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
1,100 km
684 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.7 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
100 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-32.0iVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
204 Nm
150 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,235 kg
2,723 lb
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Range score
688 km
427 mi
1,100 km
684 mi
CO2 score
150 g/km
131 g/km
Trunk score
350 L
12.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
100 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-3 2.0iVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km8.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi14.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal750 L198 US gal165 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,313 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Is 270 kg lighter
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI

  • Has 136 Nm more
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 413 km (256 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-3 2.0i
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0i
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI
2.0i
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 TDI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
2.0i
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 TDI
280TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
2.0i
1.4 TFSI COD
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsAUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
2.0 TDI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0i
1.4 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0i
1.5 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
2.0 TDI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
Mazda CX-3 2.0i vs Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster