Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t81 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,753kg3,865lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 96.0s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.0s Calculated | 60.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 845km525mi Calculated | 1,224km761mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 3,940-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,940 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.0 s | 60.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 845 km 525 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,224 km 761 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 845 km 525 mi | 1,224 km 761 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 88 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 379 km (236 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























