Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted212 km/h132 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,184 km736 mi
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,849 kg4,076 lb
- Largest trunk835 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,849kg4,076lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,409kg5,311lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.1s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,184km736mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 835L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 2,065L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.1 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 10 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
Although Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,184 km 736 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,184 km 736 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 835 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 355 km (221 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 358 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























